||
By Allen Garr, Vancouver Courier Dec. 11, 2015, 6 a.m.
https://www.biv.com/article/2015/12/vancouver-housing-affordability-crisis-modeand-its/
Image: Condo ownership for previous generations used to be the bottom rung of the ladder leading to the ultimate goal of single-family home ownership. Credit: Shutterstock
Housing affordability, which started as an “issue” before becoming a “problem” and finally a crisis shows every sign of simply getting worse. And it doesn’t really matter whether you want to own or rent.
In a real
estate market that is both globally desirable and significantly constrained in
terms of available product — as Vancouver is — house prices have been recently
increasing by double digits.
The
breathtaking rise is driven, as research tells us, by off-shore dough. Buying
at the high end of the market creates a domino effect leaving those who were once
able to squeeze in at the bottom, seeking home ownership well beyond the city’s
limits.
But there is more. Condo ownership for previous generations was the bottom rung of the ladder leading to the ultimate goal of single-family home ownership, white picket fence etc. etc. You know, build up your equity then move along just before the kiddies start arriving or at least before they are big enough to need their own bedroom.
Now condo ownership isn’t the first step; quite often it is the last. But not so fast.
I direct
you to last Friday’s Globe and Mail’s business pages and a report from Canada
Mortgage and Housing Corporation; the headline reads “More foreign buyers own
Canadian condos.”
CMHC found
that in Vancouver 3.5% of condos are owned by people whose primary residence is
outside of Canada. (That’s the highest of all three cities where the numbers
are notably rising including Toronto and Winnipeg.) Here, it is up from 2.3% in
2014. While the percentage may seem relatively small, the net effect is to drive
up condo prices right across the market.
And how
about those rentals? I mean, after all, more than 50% of the folks in Vancouver
are renters. Well, there too is little to cheer about. According to the city’s
housing policy staff, a “healthy” vacancy rate is between 3% and 5%. The
vacancy rate in Vancouver is 0.5%.
This week
council is considering what it calls “new protections for Vancouver’s tenants
and rental housing stock.” There would be more money from landlords to support
tenants who have to move including, for some, months of free rent and funds for
moving expenses.
The city
is, however, powerless to control rents or what are referred to as
“renovictions” where tenants are tossed out so landlords can add a lick of
paint and a new bathroom sink then jack up the rent.
There is
one not insignificant lever the city has: Rate of Change Regulations. These are
regulations that have been around since the late 1980s and cover 47,000 of
Vancouver’s 67,000 rental units in buildings with six or more suites.
Since 2007,
none of those 47,000 suites can be demolished unless they are replaced on a
one-to-one basis. The problem is that while the number of units being protected
remains the same, the population has increased; the vacancy rate dropped by
half.
The B.C.
Non Profit Housing Association released a report last month covering 521
Canadian municipalities and measuring “rental housing health.” It’s based on a
2011 National Housing Survey and measures affordability, percentage of tenants
spending more than 50% of their income on housing, overcrowding and the amount
of money tenants would need to meet the national standard of spending less than
30% of their income on housing.
Of those
521 municipalities, Vancouver came in at 516. But we can be thankful we
are not Burnaby. In spite of the fact that rents are somewhat lower there, they
came dead last.
While
Vancouver protects rentals with Rate of Change Regulations, no such regulations
exist out in Mayor Derek Corrigan’s one-party state. In fact, modestly priced
rental units are coming down at a record rate to be replaced by high-priced
condos.
One other
point: While foreign funds continue to roll in and Victoria and Ottawa dither
about what to do, a growing number of people from Maple Ridge to Saanich to
Prince George find themselves living in tent cities. These are not only drug
addicts or the mentally ill. Increasingly, they are workers living paycheque to
paycheque unable to find affordable housing in the midst of this worsening
crisis.
8:11 AM PST, MON JANUARY 25, 2016
Image: Vancouver House / Shutterstock
While Vancouver ranks as having the least affordable housing market in Canada, it is third least affordable in the world, according to a new study.
Vancouver only falls behind Sydney, Australia in second place and Hong Kong, China in first, as ranked by the 12th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey, which gives third quarter 2015 results.
The study also noted Vancouver was fourth most
vulnerable among the cities surveyed for a real estate bubble risk,
despite the forecast of a rise in the median price of a detached home to
$2.1 million over the next 15 years. That’s nearly double the current
median price of a detached home in Vancouver at $1.2 million.
SEE ALSO: Affordability crisis will cause Vancouver housing market to slow in 2016
B.C. had four cities in the top five of the least affordable in Canada: Vancouver came in first, Victoria second, the Fraser Valley fourth, and Kelowna fifth. Toronto took the third place spot.
The situation in Vancouver has been described by some experts as a crisis. The lack of affordability in the city will cause the housing market to slow in 2016, Royal Le page predicts, although increases will still happen.
In 2015, the price of a starter bungalow increased 16.8% year-over-year, but it’s predicted it will only increase 9% this year.
In Metro Vancouver, RE/MAX is predicting the average price of a detached home will break the million dollar mark in 2016.
Nationally, Canada is rated by the DIHAS as “moderately unaffordable.”
Not to fret, though – there are still affordable places to live in Canada. Moncton and Saint John – both in New Brunswick – tied for the most affordable places to live nationally. Fredericton, Saugenay, Charlottetown, Trois-Rivières, Windsor, Thunder Bay, and Sudbury were also considered very affordable spots to live in Canada, according to the survey.
In the same survey last year, Vancouver was ranked as the second least affordable housing market in the world, only topped by Hong Kong. Sydney came in third.
The study surveyed Australia, Canada, China, Ireland, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
10 least affordable markets in the world:
Hong Kong, China
Sydney, Australia
Vancouver, Canada
Melbourne, Australia
Auckland, New Zealand
San Jose, USA
San Francisco, USA
London, UK
Los Angeles, USA
San Diego, USA
10 most affordable markets in the world:
Limerick, Ireland
Waterford, Ireland
Cumberland, USA
Decatur, USA
Elmira, USA
Kankakee, USA
Rockford, USA
Topeka, USA
Youngstown, USA
Peoria, USA
法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|小黑屋|手机版|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca
GMT-5, 2025-10-8 06:03 , Processed in 0.044348 second(s), 18 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.